Fix Your Hook
Subscribe now to watch the full video.
One of the most endearing and often times frustrating parts of golf can be the "highs" and "lows" that come with playing the game. Without a doubt, a request that I hear from almost every student is that they would like to become more "consistent". Or in other words, they would like to hit their good shots more often and make their bad shots less penalizing. This is obviously easier said than done as some of the best players in the world still struggle with being consistent week in and week out.
However, if we chunk the solution to this challenge into 3 key areas - swing plane, low point control, and face-to-path control - we can get a pretty clear idea as to what is causing the majority of issues for a player. Specifically, we know that looking at swing plane will help reveal the pattern and severity of curvature for our shots, flat spot length (and "arc width" on 3D) will reveal our "margin for error" or tendency to rely on timing, and the face to path relationship will clue us into our ability to start the ball down the intended target line.
Ultimately, if you can balance out all (3) of these areas, you will have the recipe for hitting a lot of well struck golf shots that start down your line and fly relatively straight. However, if any one of these keys to consistency are out of order, you are going to rely more on compensation and timing, which will be an issue for your development in the long run.
Tags: Poor Contact, Not Straight Enough, Not Enough Distance, Concept, Advanced
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
This video is discussing the three consistency keys.
00:00:04,000 --> 00:00:10,000
So virtually every golfer I've ever worked with expresses the desire to be more consistent.
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:15,000
All right, we all want to hit our good shots more often.
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:19,000
But often times when I ask them, well, what does a consistent golf swing look like?
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:23,000
They give me kind of a, I don't know, look and they'll start talking about the grip or
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:27,000
their setup or their backswing or whatever.
00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:33,000
So in this video, I'm going to try to share with you the three keys that I look for when
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,000
I'm looking at consistency.
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:41,000
And I'll try to tie in a few of the big movements, how they relate to consistency, as well
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:48,000
as some of the kind of older old school versions or old school tips, the golfers have used
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:52,000
in order to develop more consistency and what it actually changes.
00:00:53,000 --> 00:01:00,000
So the three keys in my mind to consistency are looking at swing plane, looking at low point
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:05,000
control and looking at face to path relationship throughout the swing.
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:13,000
If you can master those three keys, swing plane, low point face to path, you can usually
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:20,000
develop a swing that produces relatively straight shots, relatively solid contact, relatively
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:21,000
little curve.
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:26,000
And really, that's the easiest shot or that's the most repeatable pattern that I found
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:28,000
when most of my golfers.
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,000
Golfers who struggle with either their swing plane or their low point control or their
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,000
face control tend to be less consistent.
00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:39,000
Golfers who struggle with all three of those tend to be really inconsistent and tend to have
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:41,000
very poor misses.
00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:46,000
So in this video, we'll just jump into each of those three keys.
00:01:46,000 --> 00:01:49,000
The first one would be looking at swing plane.
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:55,000
So if we're looking from the down the line camera angle, we're basically looking at
00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:59,000
from about waist height through waist height, where is this club swinging?
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:03,000
Is it swinging more along a path going out to the right like this?
00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,000
Is it swinging more along a path going out to in like that?
00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,000
Is it swinging along a path that's very vertical and up and down?
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:16,000
Is it swinging along a path that's more shallow or more horizontal?
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:22,000
So all those factor into ideally what we're trying to create with our swing plane.
00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:28,000
Now I can't just stand here and give you a recipe like, okay, set up to the club and draw
00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:29,000
line up the shaft.
00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:33,000
That's exactly where you want it because that's not really how it works.
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:39,000
But it's important to understand that if you have a swing plane that's coming massively
00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:47,000
into out massively out to in is extremely flat on the way through or extremely upright
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:51,000
on the way through unless you're hitting a club where you want that path, it's going
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,000
to lead the inconsistency.
00:02:54,000 --> 00:02:59,000
So somewhere around, if you put the camera so that it's in line with the back of your
00:02:59,000 --> 00:03:06,000
hand from this down the line view and then you were to draw up a plane there, it'll typically
00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:10,000
be a little higher than where it was set up and you can use that as a reference from
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:13,000
about waste height through to about waste height.
00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:18,000
If it follows pretty close to that path, you'll tend to have straighter shots, you'll
00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:23,000
tend to have less dramatic misses.
00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:28,000
Okay, so that helps with more of the shape of the curve but that doesn't really help with
00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:32,000
solidness of contact especially with your second shots.
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:37,000
So you could be dead on plane and shoot a million because you hit a foot in a half
00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:41,000
behind the golf ball or you top the ball.
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:45,000
So that's where looking at the face on camera and looking at low point control is a big
00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:46,000
issue.
00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:49,000
So from the face on camera, now we're looking at low point control.
00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:54,000
So now we're looking at the width of this circle along whatever path it's swinging
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:55,000
on.
00:03:55,000 --> 00:04:02,000
So I'm looking at is the circle centered here, is the circle centered here, is it more
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:08,000
of a squished circle like an ellipse or is it have a very pronounced kind of high to
00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:10,000
low contact.
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:16,000
A lot of golfers struggle with either getting the club to swing up really quickly or getting
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:20,000
the club to swing very narrow on the way through.
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:26,000
Golfers tend to be more consistent with their long game, tend to have a wider look through
00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:28,000
the follow-through.
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:34,000
The component I measure on 3D is arc width and I find there's a high correlation between
00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:39,000
the arc width graph and a golfers perceive level of consistency.
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:47,000
So if I look at this face on view and it's got kind of a nice flat shallow bottom to
00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:52,000
the swing out in front of the golf ball and it's really wide and the down the line has
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:55,000
a look that's pretty much on plane.
00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:59,000
I'm probably going to be pretty consistent in terms of my solidness of contact.
00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:06,000
Now as far as the last look or last piece which is looking at more direction we're going
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,000
to look at the face-to-path relationship.
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:14,000
So golfers who tend to be more consistent with their longer game tend to have a little
00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:19,000
bit faster closing the club face early and then a little bit slower or more gradual
00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:21,000
closing in the club face late.
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:30,000
So even if it looks like they're on plane and the face on view isn't too bad then typically
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:36,000
what'll happen is the club face comes in really open and then tries to square up very
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:38,000
late.
00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:44,000
The rare exception it will come in very close and then use some type of chicken wing hold
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:48,000
off move on the way through to open it back up.
00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:52,000
That typically will also show up from the face on view.
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:58,000
So if you're really struggling with consistency take a look at these three elements.
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:02,000
So look at swing plane because that's absolutely related to consistency of off-light.
00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:09,000
Look at low point control and how the arms are either widening or if they're narrowing
00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,000
and look at the club face control.
00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:18,000
So we'll do a little nine to three where we try to focus on face control, swing plane,
00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:19,000
and wide point.
00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:23,000
So the three keys to consistency I got really good turf contact maybe just a slight
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:30,000
pull because of maybe an upper body lunge but overall that was a really solid strike demonstrating
00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,000
those three keys.
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:37,000
We did the opposite or if we did a bad version where I'm going to have a little bit more
00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:41,000
of a scoop throw it out in early extend.
00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:49,000
You can see that I made solid contact luckily on that one but I struggled with face control
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,000
because of the face the way I was controlling the face more with the flip, less with the
00:06:52,000 --> 00:06:57,000
motorcycle and I struggled a little bit with toe contact because of the narrowness on the
00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:58,000
way through.
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:05,000
So as you can see you can use these two camera looks in order to help really dial in what
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:09,000
is causing you problems whether it be contact, whether it be ball flight, whether it be
00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:15,000
start line and now you know the three keys to mastering your individual consistency.
00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:21,000
Now originally when I was designing this video I contemplated adding these last two pieces
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:26,000
but they're a little bit harder to just observe and that would be looking at kind of
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,000
tempo and tension.
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:35,000
So tempo or sequencing the more that you use your body early and the arms late,
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:40,000
typically that's going to relate to this wide point from the face on view or this is
00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:44,000
going to relate to that low point control from the face on view.
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:50,000
Typically golfers who have more early arm action and more aggressive arm action will
00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:55,000
tend to have a little bit more of a flip style or scoop style release and now you'll
00:07:55,000 --> 00:08:02,000
see that a flip style or scoop style release becomes a problem because of what it does
00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:08,000
to low point control and often what it does to the face to path relationship.
00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:12,000
But you can have a flip style or release and still be on plane.
00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:18,000
So these golfers typically hit the ball relatively straight but complain of contact,
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:20,000
complain of distance.
00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:25,000
In addition when you have too much tension in your arms it's really hard to let the club
00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:32,000
shallow which is means it's really hard to have even tempo and nice sequencing and when
00:08:32,000 --> 00:08:38,000
the club tends to steep in transition it will tend to get shallow late and so it can
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:43,000
cause a swing path or swing plane that gets shifted way out there or if you feel that
00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:49,000
that's going to happen then it allows you to have more of a wrist roll or kind of more
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:54,000
of a swivel style release or flip style release on the way through where your hands
00:08:54,000 --> 00:09:02,000
are doing more flexion extension instead of arm extension coupled with a little bit
00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:04,000
of forearm rotation.
00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:10,000
So what you'll start to see is that yes these three things are the three observable
00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:14,000
ways you can use video to look at your consistency but you do also want to factor in some
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:21,000
of the old school things of tempo and tension because those can impact or have a profound
00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:25,000
impact on either one of these key components that consistent.