Subscribe now to watch the full video.
As the last segment of our 3-part Matt Wolff swing analysis, I thought it would be fun to do a quick comparison to Jim Furyk. Despite the fact these (2) players have been discussed in the same breath lately, I believe their swings are actually quite different.
While they both share sharply vertical backswings and a strong shallowing of the club in transition, the ways in which they create these patterns are contrasting. Wolff generates more torso/pelvis rotation and sequences his downswing in a traditional "1-2-3" manner; this allows his arms to remain relatively passive before fully releasing at impact. As for Furyk, he rotates his torso/pelvis minimally in the backswing and relies on a vertical drop of the arms in transition to shallow the club. From there, he rotates hard through impact and his arms do not fully release until well after the ball is struck.
Ultimately, I think this is an interesting exercise as it shows how (2) world-class players can share a few common positions, yet have radically different "engines" behind them. Hopefully, it can provide a few ideas for examining the subtleties in your own swing.
Tags: Analysis
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:08,000
And this analysis video, we're going to do a quick comparison between gym fury and
00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:11,000
Matt Wolfswing, the see if they're really doing the same thing.
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:17,000
So I see a lot of comparisons right now between Matt Wolf and gym fury.
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:23,000
And I'm going to let these play through so that way if you're watching, you can go through
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,000
and use the little, the comma or period case.
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:31,000
You can frame back and forth and look at these swings and decide for yourself how similar
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:33,000
they really are.
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:40,000
Okay, so from one perspective, we can say that they both have a pretty big shallowing movement.
00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:47,000
We can see that the club kind of has some rotation in there and then the Matt Wolfswing,
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:48,000
club has some rotation in there.
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:51,000
So there's a pretty big, clean shift at the top of the swing.
00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:55,000
But that's pretty much where I think the similarities begin and end.
00:00:55,000 --> 00:01:00,000
If we look at Matt Wolfswing, we can see that there's not a lot of wrist movement and
00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:06,000
there's a lot of body movement to bring the club up to the top of swing.
00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,000
The body's happening from the hips and the trunk.
00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:15,000
When we look at gym fury swing, we'll see that most of the body movement is done here
00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:16,000
in that first part of the takeaway.
00:01:16,000 --> 00:01:21,000
He doesn't have very much pelvis rotation, he doesn't have very much trunk rotation,
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:24,000
and he simply creates the height with the shoulders.
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:30,000
Because he hasn't rotated, if he was to then really rotate his body, he would get steep.
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,000
Everything would come outside the line.
00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:40,000
So then he creates a big shallowing movement at the shoulder, where Matt Wolf,
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:47,000
because he had this big body rotation, his body can rotate and the shallowing movement
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,000
is going to happen more at the wrist.
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:55,000
He doesn't have to create this vertical arm movement of his shoulder on the way down.
00:01:55,000 --> 00:02:01,000
He can essentially keep the arms at a more consistent height compared to his body,
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:05,000
and then shallow with the wrist while his body rotates pretty hard.
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:11,000
So if we look over here with the gym, we'll see again a really big arm.
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:16,000
If we're looking at the height of the arm compared to the chest,
00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:23,000
we'll see that there's a really big drop down there through transition as his hips turn out of the way.
00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:26,000
As his hips turn out of the way, you'll see that there's kind of a hinge,
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:33,000
or there's a lack of communication from the lower body going into his chest.
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:40,000
So basically his chest stays fairly close, then then it has a pretty good right through there,
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:44,000
and then it has a pretty good rotation through impact,
00:02:44,000 --> 00:02:50,000
where Matt Wolf does a great job of rotating his lower body in his trunk,
00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:54,000
so he gets into a really good delivery position here,
00:02:54,000 --> 00:03:01,000
and then he can go a little bit more vertical and really kind of fire those arms down through impact,
00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:05,000
where because of gym's position, he can't really fire those arms through impact.
00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:10,000
It's more of a arms are along for the ride type situation.
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:14,000
Now, while I think their engines are very different,
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:19,000
some of the nuances of what makes them good at what they do is extremely different,
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:24,000
I do want to highlight one little thing, which is if you are going to have a really big shallow movement,
00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:27,000
you cannot have a lot of forearm tension.
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:34,000
So we're going to key in on two places where we can see that both of these golfers demonstrate
00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:38,000
softness, especially in the right hand at the top of the swing.
00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:41,000
All right, so we're going to look from two different views, but we're looking for
00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:47,000
what's going on with the right hand. So here with Matt Wolf, as I talked about in the
00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:53,000
driver analysis video, you'll see that right index finger open up and kind of come off the club,
00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:58,000
and it's going to stay, while the pressure of the index finger stays there,
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:04,000
the, he's not gripping the club, which would be more of a sign of, of some tension in that
00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:11,000
top side of that forearm. So by having that hand a little bit more soft and open, that allows
00:04:11,000 --> 00:04:16,000
for that rotation and then he kind of re-grabbs onto the club right around here. Okay, so now
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,000
if we look at Jim Furik and we go to the down the line view and set the face on view,
00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:26,000
it's not going to show up exactly the same, but as he does his shelling movement, you can see
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:32,000
a gaping or a shadow appear between the right palm and the glove hand. In fact, when we get
00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:38,000
down to a kind of in this zone here, you can see that a lot of that right palm has come off the
00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:46,000
club. And part of that is because with where his elbow is that far behind him, if he was to keep
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:52,000
the hand in contact with the club and he had normal joint range of motion, the club would be steep.
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:57,000
So the only way that he can have the arm behind and get that amount of shallowness is to have
00:04:57,000 --> 00:05:02,000
the trail hand actually coming off the club. Well, if you're gripping really hard with that
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:08,000
trail hand, you're probably not going to have it come off the club and then he gets it to re-attach
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:13,000
kind of down in this zone here. So one big takeaway you can learn from studying these two golf swings
00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:18,000
is that if you want to have the club shallow in transition, you don't want to squeeze it really
00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:26,000
tight with that trail arm. But I want us to understand that simple plane shifts don't really
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:32,000
indicate that every golfer is using their their body the same way. I would say that
00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:38,000
Matt Wolfe and Jim Furik are demonstrating two very different looking golf swings. They have one
00:05:38,000 --> 00:05:45,000
common element that that makes them easy to compare. But if you're trying to like learn how to
00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:50,000
apply it and understand your own swing, you want to understand some of these nuances of
00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:56,000
what powers this swing, so how are they using the body, what helps them make solid contract
00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:01,000
contacts, so how do they control their steeps and shallow balance and then how do they hit it straight,
00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:06,000
how do they control the club face, if we're looking at it more from that framework,
00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:16,000
then these two have very different golf swings.